Meg had the inspiration for a picture of Casey’s face superimposed over the heads on a fountain we saw at the Boston Public Garden. The picture speaks for itself really. There isn’t much I can say.
Archive for the ‘Photoshopping’ Category
Casey Photoshop
Saturday, June 23rd, 2007How To Make a MySpace Avatar
Sunday, June 3rd, 2007![]() Here I am, ready to recite my poetry to the internet. Or am I? |
Everybody knows that glasses are only cool if you don’t need them to see, so I took mine off. But I can’t use this. There are a couple problems with this picture: 1. I am looking directly at the camera. 2. I am smiling. I don’t want people to know that I took this picture just for MySpace, so I should tone it down some. Let’s see what I look like when I’m in my “natural” state. |
| Here is take two. I’m not looking at the camera, and I don’t look very happy. A vast improvement over the previous picture! I think I look a little too angsty though. You want to look angsty, but you don’t want to look like you’re trying to look angsty. Because if you were trying to do something, then that means you care about something, and that breaks the cardinal rule of being a teenager. Let’s try a third shot. | ![]() I don’t even like MySpace. Or anything. |
![]() You don’t understand me. Nobody does. |
Perfect! I’m staring at a point just next to the camera, with little to no visible emotion. Now, all I need to do is apply some grayscale and a high-contrast filter, and I’m done! Let’s throw it together with a red-text-on-black-background page and see what we get. |
1. Look slightly away from the camera.
2. Angst, but not too much angst.
3. Judicious use of Photoshop filters.
Best of luck! Or whatever.
Fractal
Monday, August 14th, 2006I just found this lying around on the server but I don’t think I’ve ever made a blog post about it. A higher resolution version can be found here. This fractal was generated from the Mandelbrot set with some photoshopping afterwards.

Color
Monday, July 24th, 2006I was reading Slashdot at work today and came across an interesting thread about color, encoding of color, and the human perception of color (in an article tagged ’snakesonaplane’, no less). Here are some of the more interesting things I found.
1. Finding berries is exceedingly hard if you are red-green colorblind. To simulate what this might look like to a red-green colorblind person, I took an image containing some berries, split it into component RGB channels, and overwrote each of the red and green channels with the average of the two, then combined it all back into a master image. Here is the result. It is indeed hard to spot berries with no red-green information. Hooray for survival of the fittest. (You can click on the image for the original version.)

2. Most* display devices are unable to reproduce all colors. This almost certainly includes the monitor you’re looking at right now. CRT and LCD monitors show colors in the sRGB colorspace, which is some subset of the colors that the human eye can perceive (sRGB is an accepted standard). For a visual example of this, see the following image grabbed from Wikipedia.

I’m not sure I fully understand what is going on, but the outer curve encompasses the CIE 1931 color space**, which if I understand correctly is the most widely accepted approximation of the range of colors humans can see. The inner triangle encompasses the range of colors that can be expressed with sRGB. The big losers here are greens and cyans, though partcularly bright versions of other colors miss out as well. There are alternative RGB colorspaces that are used, though none as widely as sRGB. One popular such example is Adobe RGB, which is accepted to be much better than sRGB. RGB colorspaces need not even be used; there is also CMYK (Cyan-Magenta-Yellow-Key[black]) , HSV (Hue-Saturation-Brightness), and others, though each of these has shortcomings as well. For example, CMYK is much better at displaying Cyan, but worse at displaying Red, as you might expect. In the above picture with the curve and the triangle, imagine if the points of the triangle were rotated about 45 degrees and you can get an idea of the kinds of extra colors you’d get and ones that would go missing.
For a more interactive example of how your monitor is unable to produce cyan, here is an interesting picture. In case you were never 6 years old and don’t know how these work, put your face near your monitor and stare at the white dot in the center of the red circle for about a minute. You should notice a faint blue aura around the circle start to form. As this happens, slowly move your face back from the monitor and it will get bigger. This color you are seeing is “true” cyan and cannot be displayed by your monitor — the approximations in sRGB are showed on the right for contrast.

** The paradox of the CIE 1931 colorspace image is that if you are viewing it on a monitor then you aren’t seeing the full colorspace, you’re seeing an sRGB approximation of it. One can imagine this picture printed out on paper showing the actual CIE 1931 colorspace and then the sRGB subset.
Objection!
Wednesday, February 1st, 2006Erik challenged me to modify some pictures of Saddam Hussein to look like Phoenix Wright and who am I to refuse? Here are the results.


Photoshop Saturday
Monday, October 31st, 2005(21:03:24) DavTheGook: http://flickr.com/photos/mterry/57211182/
(21:03:29) DavTheGook: you wanna do a photoshop saturday?
(21:03:35) DavTheGook: cuz I think mikix needs to be a rocker
(21:07:05) JakeTwo3: yes.
The original:
To quote Mikix’s flickr account, “Nothing Says Metal Like Pink.” Indeed. As soon as I saw this picture I wondered what he would look like if he were actually metal. Fortunately, The Gimp gives me the power to see for myself.

My version:
I went for more of a rebellious punk rock angle.

Jake’s version:
He went for more of a ridiculous glam rock angle.

I’m told the inspiration for Jake’s entry was Dee Snider of Twisted Sister.
Also: Holy crap, Mikix is hot when he’s a rebel.
It’s a trap!
Thursday, September 29th, 2005Today Jake and I had a small photoshopping contest between the two of us. The original image is here:

Here are the two competing entries. I rolled randomly to determine which one to put on the top and which one to put on the bottom so there’s no bias there.


We are looking to gather votes from a few people to see who “won” the contest. But, really, everyone’s a winner! So, leave some comments with your preferences. Refer to the top one as A, and the bottom one as B.



