Comments on: Optical Illusion http://dav.sadowl.com/archives/15/ Now with 54% more statistics. Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:27:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Rich http://dav.sadowl.com/archives/15/comment-page-1/#comment-39 Rich Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:18:28 +0000 http://dav.rivercityransomtactics.com/?p=15#comment-39 Yes, that makes perfect sense: say halves when, for many of the new "people" it is 90+% of one, and Yes, that makes perfect sense: say halves when, for many of the new “people” it is 90+% of one, and

]]> By: Michael Terry http://dav.sadowl.com/archives/15/comment-page-1/#comment-38 Michael Terry Sat, 17 Sep 2005 15:14:58 +0000 http://dav.rivercityransomtactics.com/?p=15#comment-38 Uh, well sure. That page just restates what I said. But it's not just slivers. It's whole portions of people. I used the phrase halves because people are cut into two parts. Some of them are slivers, but some of them are about half of a person. Uh, well sure. That page just restates what I said. But it’s not just slivers. It’s whole portions of people. I used the phrase halves because people are cut into two parts. Some of them are slivers, but some of them are about half of a person.

]]> By: Rich http://dav.sadowl.com/archives/15/comment-page-1/#comment-37 Rich Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:27:52 +0000 http://dav.rivercityransomtactics.com/?p=15#comment-37 Much more complicated than that. It's not halves, it's tiny slivers that are removed and carefully placed, in a rough image, to "create" 13 smaller men out of the pieces of 12. I had a hard time verbalizing the answer, so take a look here: http://www.defectiveyeti.com/archives/001258.html. It confirmed my impressions, and expressed them much better (with colors and numbers and whatnot). Much more complicated than that. It’s not halves, it’s tiny slivers that are removed and carefully placed, in a rough image, to “create” 13 smaller men out of the pieces of 12.

I had a hard time verbalizing the answer, so take a look here: http://www.defectiveyeti.com/archives/001258.html. It confirmed my impressions, and expressed them much better (with colors and numbers and whatnot).

]]> By: Michael Terry http://dav.sadowl.com/archives/15/comment-page-1/#comment-36 Michael Terry Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:18:24 +0000 http://dav.rivercityransomtactics.com/?p=15#comment-36 On the image with 13, look at the person on the far left (Amy), and the person sixth from the left (Sue). Amy's head has no part from the top, and Sue's feet have no part from the bottom. In that manner, in the 13-frame, two separate people-halves are not connected. In the 12-frame, each person has a piece from the top *and* the bottom. I think that is where you lose a dude. But it still weirds me out. :) On the image with 13, look at the person on the far left (Amy), and the person sixth from the left (Sue).

Amy’s head has no part from the top, and Sue’s feet have no part from the bottom. In that manner, in the 13-frame, two separate people-halves are not connected. In the 12-frame, each person has a piece from the top *and* the bottom.

I think that is where you lose a dude. But it still weirds me out. :)

]]>